ḠILZĪ or ḠALZĪ (Pashtu/Paxtu plural of sg. masc. Ḡilzāy and sg. fem. Ḡilzey), one of three major Pashtun/Paxtun tribal confederations in Afghanistan. The other two are the Dorrānī, formerly the Abdālī (qq.v.), in western Afghanistan and the Karlānrī, who straddle the border between Afghanistan and the Northwest Frontier Province. Although the name of this confederation is often transcribed in Western literature as Ḡilzī (or Ghilzai, etc.), the present author holds that the correct transliteration for this Pashtu term is Ḡalzī, which will be used throughout this article.
Historical reference is first made to the Ḡalzī in the early 16th century chronicles (e.g., Bābor-nāma, tr. Beveridge, p. 323) as a culturally distinct people in Afghanistan. They constitute about two fifths of the estimated total population of eight million Pashtuns in Afghanistan. They are concentrated in the area between the Durand Line (q.v.) in the southeast and a line stretching from Qandahār via Ḡaznī (q.v.) to Kabul, and eastwards to Jalālābād in the northeast. Large numbers of Ḡalzī were forced to settle in northern Afghanistan by the Dorrānī government after the Ḡalzī rebellion of the 1880s. In Afghanistan they are known for their orthodox adherence to paštūnwaley, i.e., the Pashtun charter for appropriate social behavior, and their insistence on the edicts ofhaving Pashtu, doing Pashtu, and speaking Pashtu (Paxtū larel, Paxtū kawel, and Paxtū wayel), emphasizing the importance of internalizing Pashtun tribal cultural values, social behavior based on these values, and competence in speaking Pashtu in the construction of Pashtun ethnic identity.
Some historians have speculated about the Turkish origin of the Ḡalzī. A few consider them the descendants of the pre-Islamic Hephtalites (e.g., Caroe, pp. 81-83, 132); others suggest a historical relationship with the Ḵalaj (Frazer-Tytler, pp. 11-12; Minorsky), a people who speak an identifiable Turkish language. Chronicles locate the Ḵalaj near Qandahār and Ḡaznī in the 10th century C.E. (see Minorsky; Caroe, p. 132). Indeed, Ḵalaj is the name of a small modern (non-Ḡalzī) Pashtu-speaking market town near the city of Laškargāh and the ruins of the 11th-12th centuries royal city of Laškarī Bāzār in southwestern Afghanistan. Linguistic data about a number of small Ḵalaj-speaking communities in Central Persia is available (Doerfer; Minorsky; Bosworth). Some Indian and Western historians and several nationalistically inspired Afghan writers have proposed that the Turkish Ḵaljī and the Lodī dynasties that ruled northern India during 689-720/1290-1320 and 855-932/1451-1526 respectively were Ḡalzī Pashtuns. However, the Ḡalzī Pahstuns speak Pashtu, a member of the Iranian branch of Indo-European languages, and exhibit specific socio-cultural and liguistic features that do not resemble those of the Ḵalaj or any other Turkish groups (see Morgenstierne, in EIr. I, pp. 516-22; Doerfer; Minorsky). There is no known systematic and conclusive ethnological body of evidence to support important Ḡalzī and Hephtalite/Ḵalaj/Ḵaljī/Lodī cultural, historical, and/or socio-structural relationships.
Ḡalzī tribal genealogies in general trace their early descent from the union of either Shah Ḥosayn, a Ghurid (q.v.) prince, and Bībī Mātō, a granddaughter of Qays ʿAbd al-Rašīd, the putative ancestor of all Pashtuns, or Mokarram Shah, a Pashtun prince from Ḡūr, and the daughter of a Persian notable (Burton, pp. 1-6). In both versions a son named Ḡalzoy, son of Ḡal (Pashtu ḡal “thief,” zoy “son”), ancestor of the Ḡalzī, descendants of ḡal, is conceived before marriage. With some variation, most genealogical accounts indicate that Ḡalzoy had two sons, Borhān, also known as Ebrāhīm, and Tūrān. The descendants of Turān are the Western Ḡalzī while Borhān is considered the progenitor of the Eastern Ḡalzī (Gazetteer of Afghanistan VI, pp. 203-4). The main tribes of the Western Ḡalzī are the Hōtak, Tōḵī, and Ḵarōṭī. The Solaymān Ḵēl, ʿAlī Ḵēl, and the Tarəkī are the prominent tribes of the Eastern Ḡalzī. Several segments of mostly Eastern Ḡalzī are pastoral nomads who traverse between the central highlands of Afghanistan in the summer and the Indus plains beyond the border of Afghanistan in winter.
The Ḡalzī have been prominent in the modern history of Afghanistan, the Hōtak in western Afghanistan, and the Solaymān Ḵēl in eastern Afghanistan. The Solaymān Ḵēl of the Eastern Ḡalzī, especially the Aḥmadzī (q.v.) and Jabar Ḵēl, have played important roles in the political developments of Afghanistan. During the first Anglo-Afghan War (1839-1842, q.v.), it was the Jabar Ḵēl who inflicted the heaviest casualties on the retreating British army between Kabul and Jalālābād in winter 1842. Some Aḥmadzī chiefs were noticeable in the British military operations in southeastern Afghanistan during the second Anglo-Afghan War (1879-80, q.v.). The Aḥmadzī supported Moḥammad-Nāder in capturing Kabul and declaring himself king in 1929. Likewise, during the first and second Anglo-Afghan wars the Western Ḡalzī provided widespread military and political opposition to the occupying British forces in their attempts to create or restore various Dorrānī rulers in Afghanistan. The Ḡalzī in general have been the source of regular opposition to the Dorrānī dominated government of Afghanistan.
During the period of Persian control of western Afghanistan in the 16th-17th centuries, the Abdālī, also called Dorrānī, were the chief local supporters of the Persians, while the Ḡalzī provided organized military and political opposition to Persian rule. The struggle for domination in Afghanistan between the Ḡalzī and Abdālī dates back to this period when the Mughal and Persian empires competed for the control of the province of Qandahār. After Shah ʿAbbās I (997-1039/1587-1629) relocated the Abdālī vassals from Qandahār to Herāt, the Ḡalzī, especially the Hōtaks, became dominant in the former city. In 1121/1709, Mīr Ways, a Hōtak chief, overthrew Persian rule in Qandahār and declared independence (Krusinski, I, pp. 183-87; Lockhart, 1958, pp. 86-92). After his death in 1128/1715, he was succeeded in Qandahār by his brother, ʿAbd-al-ʿAzīz, but he was killed by Mīr Ways’s son, Maḥmūd Hōtak, who succeeded him in 1130/1717. Maḥmūd invaded Persia and captured Isfahan, the Persian capital, in 1135/1722. He was, however, overthrown by his cousin, Ašraf, the son of ʿAbd-al-ʿAzīz in 1137/1725. The Ottomans recognized Ašraf as the king of Persia after suffering a defeat at his hand. His reign in Persia soon came to an end in 1142/1729, when he was defeated in battle and driven out by the future Nāder Shah Afšār. Assisted by the Abdālīs, Nāder Shah also defeated the last independent Ḡalzay ruler of Qandahār, Shah Ḥosayn Hotak, Shah Maḥmūd’s brother in 1150/1738. Shah Ḥosayn and large numbers of the Ḡalzī were deported to Mazandarān (Marvī, pp. 543-52; Lockhart, 1938, pp. 115-20). The remnants of this once sizable exiled community, although assimilated, continue to claim Ḡalzī Pashtun descent.
With the fall of Shah Ḥosayn the Ḡalzī political domination of Afghanistan declined. From the death of Nāder Shah Afšār in 1747 up to 1978 the central government of Afghanistan was in the hands of various Persianized Dorrānī figures. The Ḡalzī opposition to their rule continued, flaring up in large-scale organized armed uprisings in 1801, 1803, 1839-42, and 1886 (Caroe; Elphinstone; Ghobar). These episodes invariably resulted in setbacks for the Ḡalzī, including their mass forced deportation, especially in 1880s, to northern Afghanistan. The 1978 Ḵalq-sponsored revolution in Afghanistan brought an end to the Dorrānī government and inaugurated what appeared to be a Ḡalzī resurgence. Three out of four presidents of post-1978 revolutionary Afghanistan, namely Nūr-Moḥammad Tarakī, Ḥafīẓ-Allāh Amīn, and Najīb- Allāh, were from the Tarəkī, Ḵarōṭī, and Aḥmadzī tribes respectively. The Ḡalzī are also prominent in the leadership of the Ṭāleb movement that has controlled much of Afghanistan since 1996.
See also AFGHANISTAN iv, vi, x
J. W. Anderson, Doing Pakhtu: Social Organization of the Ghilzai Pakhtun, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1979.
H. W. Bellew, The Races of Afghanistan, London, 1880; repr. New Delhi, 1982.
Idem,, An Inquiry into the Ethnography of Afghanistan, London, 1891; repr. Karachi, 1977.
A. R. Benawa, Mīr Ways Nīka, Kabul, 1946.
Idem, Hūtakīhā, Kabul, 1956.
W. Bernhard, Etnische Anthropologie von Afghanistan, Pakistan und Kashmir, Stuttgart, 1991.
C. E. Bosworth, “Khaladj i. History,” in EI2 IV, pp. 917-18.
J. S. Broadfoot, “Reports on Parts of the Ghilzi Country, and on Some of the Tribes in the Neighborhood of Ghazni,” JRGS, Supplementary Papers 1, 1886, pp. 341-400.
F. C. Burton, “History and Origin of the Ghilzais, Collected from Information Received through the Khans of the Tezin, the Ahmadzai Khans, and the Sehak Khan of Sarobi,” NationalArchives of India, 1880, F-No.-5, pp. 1-6.
O. Caroe, The Pathans: 550 B. C.-A. D. 1957, New York, 1958.
G. Doerfer et al., Ḵalaj Materials, Bloomington, Ind., 1971.
Idem, “Ḵaladj ii. Language,” EI2 IV, p. 918.
M. Elphinstone, An Account of the Kingdom of Caubul and its Dependencies in Persia, Tartary, and India, London, 1815, repr., Graz, 1969.
Mollā Fayż Moḥammad Kāteb-e Ḥażra, Serāj al-tawārīḵ, 3 vols., Kabul, 1333/1915; vols. 1-2 in one, Tehran, 1372 Š./1993; vol. 3 pts. 1-2, Tehran, 1370 Š./1991.
Idem, Nežād-nama-ye Afḡān, eds. K. Yazdānī and ʿA.-A. Raḥīmī, Qom, 1372 Š/1993.
W. M. Floor, The Afghan Occupation of Persia, 1721-1729, Paris, 1998.
W. K. Fraser-Tytler, “The Ghilzai: Jew, Turk or Pathan?” Eastern World 2/4, 1948, pp. 11-13.
R. N. Frye, “Ghalzay,” in EI2 II, p. 1002.
Šēr Moḥammad Khan Gandāpūr, Tawārīḵ-e ḵoršīd-e Jahān, Lahore, 1894.
Y. V. Gankovsky, The Peoples of Pakistan: An Ethnic History,Moscow, 1971.
Gazetteer of Afghanistan V, pp. 164-68; VI, pp. 202-19.
Ḡolām-Moḥammad Ḡobār, Afḡānestān dar masīr-e tārīḵ, Kabul, 1967.
C. Hamilton, An Historical Relation of the Origin, Progress, and Final Dissolution of the Government of the Rohilla Afgans in the Northern Provinces of Hindostan, London, 1787.
Jonas Hanway, An Account of the British Trade over the Caspian Sea III: The Revolutions of Persia: Containing Reign of Shah Sultan Hussein, with the Invasion of the Afghans and the Reigns of Sultan Mir Mahmud and His Succesor Sultan Ashreff, London, 1753.
Ḥafīẓ-Allāh Xād Jabbār Ḵēl, De Ḡaljāʾī heṣārak zīnī farhangī arkhūna, Kabul, 1366 Š./1987.
S. M. Imamuddin, “Lōdīs,” in EI2 V, pp. 782-85.
W. Jenkyns, Report on the District of Jalalabad, Chiefly in Regard to Revenue, Calcutta, 1879.
Q. Ḵādem, Paštūnwaley,Kabul, 1952.
M. H. Kakar, Afḡān, Afḡānestān, wa Afḡānhā wa taškīl-e dawlat dar Hendūstān, Fārs, wa Afḡānestān, Peshawar, 1988.
Khan Jahān Lodī, Mīrāṯ al-Afāḡena, Dushanbe, Manuscript Collection, Academy of Sciences, Tajikistan (see Catalog Vostochnii Rukopecei Academii Nauk Tadjikskoi SSR, I, Dushanbe, 1960, pp. 151-53).
P. Judasz T. Krusinski, Histoire de la dernière révolution de Perse, tr. anon. as The History of the Late Revolutions of Persia , 2. vols., London, 1733; 2 vols. in 1, New York, 1973.
Idem, The Chronicles of a Traveller: A History of the Afghan Wars with Persia in the Beginning of the Last Century, London, 1840; tr. ʿAbd-al-Razzāq Donbolī as Safar-nāma-ye Kerūsīnskī: Yāddāšthā-ye kešīš-e lahestānī-e ʿaṣr-e ṣafawī, ed. M. Mīr-Aḥmadī, Tehran, 1363 Š./1984.
R. Leech, “An Account of the Early Ghiljaees,” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 14, 1845, pp. 306-28.
L. Lockhart, Nadir Shah,London, 1938.
Idem, The Fall of the Ṣafavī Dynasty and the Afghan Occupation of Persia,London, 1958.
John Malcolm, The History of Persia,2 vols. London, 1815.
Moḥammad-Kaẓem Marvī, ʿĀlamārā-ye nāderī, ed. M.-A. Rīāḥī, 3 vols., Tehran, 1364 Š./1985.
V. Minorsky, “The Turkish Dialect of the Khalaj,” BSO(A)S 10/1, 1940, pp. 417-37.
Moḥammad-Ḥayāt Khan, Ḥayāt-e afḡānī, tr. H. Priestly as Afghanistan and its Inhabitants, Lahore, 1981.
S. Moinul Haq, “Khaldjis,” in EI2 IV, pp. 920-24.
M. J. Momand, Da Paxtano qabīlo šajaray, Peshawar, 1986.
J. W. Murray, A Dictionary of the Pathan Tribes of the North-West Frontier of India, Culcutta, 1899.
Neʿmat-Allāh Heravī, Maḵzan-e afḡānī, ed. and tr. B. Dorn as The History ofthe Afghans, 2 vols., London, 1829-36; repr., Dacca, 1960-62.
J. Rai, Rough Notes on the Nasar, Kharot, and Other Afghan Pawindas, Quetta, 1922.
H. G. Raverty, Notes on Afghanistan and Part of Baluchistan, Geographical, Ethnographical, and Historical, London, 1888.
J. A. Robinson, Notes on Nomad Tribes of Eastern Afghanistan, 1934, repr. Quetta, 1978.
R. Scott, Khalaj Market, USAID Afghanistan, Kabul, 1972.
Idem, Tribal and Ethnic Groups in the Helmand Valley, Occasional Paper no. 21, the Afghanistan Council, Asia Society, New York, 1980.
H. Tegey, Pashtana: Accounts from Old Texts, Traditional Narratives, Primary Sources, and Modern Writings on the Language, Early Social Life, and Country of the Pashtuns, Peshawar, 1999 (text in Pashto).
H. Vansitart, “The Descent of the Afghans from the Jews,” Asiatick Researches II, 1807, pp. 67-76.
R. Warburton, Report on the District of Lughman, Chiefly in Regard to Revenue, Simla, 1880.
(M. Jamil Hanifi)
Originally Published: December 15, 2001
Last Updated: February 9, 2012
This article is available in print.
Vol. X, Fasc. 6, pp. 670-672